Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Developer Practice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee raises concerns about 'entitlement' value when projects stall
Summary
Members argued that paperwork and entitlements create value and allow developers to profit without building; examples cited included multi-year projects and a 423-acre parcel that languished for decades.
Committee members described how securing entitlements and permits can create market value even when developers do not proceed to full construction. One participant summarized the point: "Because without the paperwork, it's just dirt. Once you have the paperwork... now you got something of value." The group discussed examples of long-delayed projects — a 423-acre parcel was cited repeatedly — and noted the town foregoes tax revenue while land remains in entitlement limbo.
The conversation informed the group's interest in tightening the FDO renewal language and agreeing what counts as demonstrable progress. Members also debated fairness for builders facing financing and market cycles; some argued a single built home can be valid progress while others said progress should be tied to overall subdivision activity. Staff was asked to prepare language weighing individual-spec home progress against broader subdivision work.
