Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Prairie County commissioners draft findings for Big Sheep Mountain zoning district after broad public comment
Summary
Commissioners on Nov. 19 reviewed public testimony and drafted findings for a proposed Big Sheep Mountain zoning district, noting repeated concerns about lights, noise, viewshed, setbacks, decommissioning and whether all property owners were properly included in the petition.
Prairie County commissioners spent much of their Nov. 19 meeting refining draft findings related to a proposed Big Sheep Mountain zoning district after hearing a large volume of public comment. The commissioners and staff worked from a draft resolution and packet and moved to capture recurring concerns including noise, shadow flicker, FAA-mandated lights, viewshed impacts and the county's potential liability if regulations were enacted as written.
Chair (listed in the transcript as the primary meeting moderator) read portions of the draft findings aloud, saying: "Creating the district to protect the public health and safety and general welfare of the people who reside within the district." Commissioners and attendees told the record that, while petitioners had said the regulations were not intended to target a single industry, much of the testimony discussed potential wind projects and their local impacts. The county clerk and others recommended consolidating duplicate comments into plain-English findings to ensure clarity in the record.
The commissioners flagged several specific topics for inclusion in the findings: mandatory aviation lighting and its alternatives, setback distances from residences and nonparticipating landowners, the potential for increased heavy truck traffic and associated road damage, concerns about shallow wells and spring impacts from vibration, decommissioning costs and reclamation processes overseen by DEQ, and whether signatures for the petition had been gathered from all affected property owners. The meeting record shows commissioners asked staff to produce printed drafts that could be edited and circulated for finalization at an upcoming session.
Next steps identified in the meeting included further drafting, circulation of a printed packet to commissioners and contacting the drafter (identified in the packet as Dan) for additional edits. The commission set the expectation of placing the zoning district on the Nov. 26 agenda for further consideration and possible vote.
