Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Reportable Disease Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Health and Welfare panel reviews reportable disease rules, adds viral hemorrhagic fevers and lowers lead threshold
Summary
The House Health and Welfare Committee reviewed a major reorganization of Idaho’s reportable disease rules, which adds viral hemorrhagic fevers and lowers the lead-reporting threshold from 5 to 3.5 µg/dL; the department said the changes align rule language with statute and federal guidance.
Jared Larson, chief of staff at the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, told the House Health and Welfare Committee the department’s rule docket for reportable diseases reduces duplicative language and focuses rule text on matters for legislative policy. "No diseases are removed from reporting requirement this year," Larson said, and the changes are intended to simplify the chapter.
Larson identified two substantive additions: viral hemorrhagic fevers — citing Ebola and Marburg as examples — and a new blood lead reporting threshold of 3.5 micrograms per deciliter, down from 5. "This changes to 3.5 micrograms per deciliter," Larson said, adding the adjustment aligns with Centers for Disease Control standards and is intended to help trigger earlier public-health responses in communities affected by legacy contamination.
Committee members pressed the department on whether removing certain language from rule might weaken protections or change access to records. Larson and Dr. Christine Hahn, the state epidemiologist, said the removal was a reorganization rather than a substantive policy change; Larson noted that rules cannot exceed state statute or HIPAA protections. "The department does not set what records can be released. That is set by either state law or federal law in the case of HIPAA," Larson said.
Dr. Hahn explained the consolidations were intended to move repetitive investigation and restriction language into single sections and to keep a short, accessible rule document. She said the table in the docket is intended to identify diseases that may be restricted in settings such as schools or daycares; the underlying reporting and investigation obligations remain in statute and longstanding program practice.
The committee’s review highlighted the practical reasons to shorten and consolidate rules but also members’ need for time and reference materials to trace where struck language is relocated. The committee later debated whether to approve the docket or hold it for additional review; see the meeting’s procedural note for the outcome and next steps.
