Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Building Safety And Design topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves fire-escape support at 402 Wisconsin Ave., asks for stone-like cladding if cost-effective

Waukesha City Landmarks Commission · February 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved a Certificate of Appropriateness to add exterior steel support beams and concrete footings for a rear fire escape at 402 Wisconsin Avenue, with a proviso that visible piers be clad or textured to resemble stone if cost-effective.

The Waukesha City Landmarks Commission approved a Certificate of Appropriateness to install exterior steel support beams and concrete footings to shore an unsafe rear fire escape at 402 Wisconsin Avenue, a Second Empire–style house dating to the 1880s.

"So, staff is recommending approval," said staff during the presentation, summarizing the application and noting that Secretary of the Interior Standards 9 and 10 apply to new additions and that the approach minimizes damage to the historic fabric. Mark Rolinger, representing the owner, said the work responds to a fire-department order and that the engineer designed the supports to avoid major interior reconstruction: "Our engineer came up with this design to... be safe for the residents."

Commission discussion focused on the appearance of concrete piers and whether they could be made to blend with the building. Commissioner Jennifer Wall moved to approve the COA "with a proviso that if possible and cost effective that it be clad in stone or etched to look like stone," and a second was recorded. Commissioners voted to approve the application.

The approved work calls for four painted black steel beams anchored by concrete footings and bolted into existing floor joists; staff recommended replacing removed siding to match existing material and noted a building permit is required. The owner agreed to explore thin stone veneer or stamped concrete as lower-cost finishes if feasible.