Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property Assessment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board trims assessment after owner argues hoop houses are removable

Village of Harrison Board of Review · July 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After hearing evidence, the Village of Harrison Board of Review reduced a contested property's assessed value from $128,800 to $120,800 following debate over whether greenhouse "hoop houses" are removable personal property exempt from real-estate assessment under state law.

The Village of Harrison Board of Review voted to lower the assessed value on a contested parcel to $120,800 after a property owner argued that hoop-house greenhouses on the site are demountable and should be treated as personal property.

The owner told the board that the hoop structures "are definitely demountable" and described how the hoops slide over pipes driven only about a foot into the ground. "All you have to do is pull up that pipe, and the structure is gone," the resident said while showing photographs. He cited a nearby operation where dozens of greenhouse structures were classified as personal property and the land was coded as agricultural-support (G4), not commercial.

Assessor Lori Sacco said her office inspected the parcel, reviewed permit activity and consulted Department of Revenue guidance. She told the board that whether structures are classified as buildings can turn on use and specific indicators, including whether the structural elements are set into the ground and whether the operation sells direct to consumers. "If it's direct to consumer, it's commercial," Sacco explained; if sales are to wholesalers it can be treated as supporting agricultural use.

Board members said they needed objective, appraisal-style counterevidence to overturn the assessor's calculations but acknowledged the owner's documentation and comparables. In debate, members agreed to reduce the assessed improvement value rather than fully accept the owner's lower figure, and the motion to change the parcel total from $128,800 to $120,800 carried on a voice vote. The clerk told the owner he will receive a written determination with instructions about appeal rights.