Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board denies comprehensive-plan amendment for North Shore Ridge parcel after neighbor concerns
Summary
The board voted down a developer request to change Parcel 39652 from business-park/industrial to low-density residential. Trustees and neighbors cited recent comprehensive-plan work, potential loss of highway-facing business land, and uncertainty over future lot counts (applicant presented 4–7 lot options). The planning commission had recommended approval.
The Village of Harrison board considered a comprehensive-plan amendment request from North Shore Ridge LLC to change the preferred future land-use designation for Parcel 39652 (Fire Lane 10) from business-park/industrial to low-density residential. The planning commission had forwarded a positive recommendation, but trustees and residents raised multiple objections and concerns about precedent.
Trustees argued the village recently completed an extensive comprehensive-plan update and warned that changing the plan now could set a precedent and remove valuable highway-front business opportunities. Several trustees also noted uncertainty about the ultimate lot yield — the developer presented both three-to-four-lot and seven-lot concepts — and said a comp-plan change would remove a constraint that otherwise protects commercial frontage and long-term planning goals. Neighbors said new residential lots could push up area assessments and create additional traffic concerns.
The developer, Tom Klisser, said the landowner had attempted to sell the parcel to a nearby data center and that sale had not occurred; for that reason the applicant prefers residential layout compatible with adjacent single-family lots. Klisser said he would accept direction from the board as to an acceptable density and promised to work with staff on lot sizing if the board signaled approval for residential use.
Outcome: After extended discussion, the motion to approve the comprehensive-plan amendment was defeated by board vote. The zoning change step that would follow a comp-plan amendment did not move forward because the comp-plan amendment failed.
Why it matters: A comp-plan amendment can change the long-term policy framework that governs future zoning actions; trustees cited the need to respect completed plan work, protect highway-facing land, and avoid unintended higher-density outcomes if residential designation were adopted without additional constraints.
Next steps: The developer may return with revised proposals or pursue other options consistent with current business-park guidance; staff will continue to follow the two-step comp-plan and zoning-change process when applicants request changes.
