Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bond expert briefs Woodland Park board on E-TRAN cash-flow borrowing program
Summary
Anthony Singh of RBC Capital Markets told the Woodland Park School District board how Colorado—s E-TRAN program bridges monthly cash shortfalls by borrowing in the municipal market and relending to districts; he cautioned about timing, caps and concentration risks and urged conservative forecasts and a buffer in the board—s resolution.
Anthony Singh, who said he manages the state—s E-TRAN program relationship at RBC Capital Markets, told the Woodland Park School District board the program exists to bridge districts—monthly payroll and operating cash needs when property-tax receipts are concentrated later in the fiscal year.
"The program was introduced 20 years ago when the state moved to a fiscal-year funding cadence," Singh said, explaining that the state borrows in the market and relends at effectively no interest to districts to avoid costly bank loans. He described a two-series issuance schedule and said the program—s work is designed to match draws to districts—cash needs so districts do not have to hold multiyear debt.
Singh outlined key operational rules the board must know: districts complete a questionnaire and a detailed monthly spreadsheet that projects weekly cash flows; draw requests are sent early in the month and must be returned by the 10th business day; and certain funds (bond reserves and legally restricted reserves) are excluded from borrowing. "Equalization money you can invest," Singh said, but he cautioned that interest-free loan proceeds intended as bridge funding "should not be invested" in ways that would impair repayment.
He flagged two practical constraints district leaders should expect: an informal underwriting guideline that districts—borrowing should not exceed about 70% of the March/May/June property-tax component, and close scrutiny when a district requests a large first-year draw or shows heavy concentration in a small number of taxpayers. "If you borrow unnecessarily and invest it, that's not what the program is intended for," he said.
The board and Singh discussed timing: issue windows are typically August (series A) and January (series B), and money may realistically be available to districts starting in September if resolutions are filed on the program—s calendar. Singh recommended adding a modest buffer (he suggested roughly 10%) to the resolution amount so the district does not need to return to the board for small adjustments.
Next steps for the district include finalizing the spreadsheet and presenting a resolution authorizing participation. Singh said he had signed off on Woodland Park—s spreadsheet and questionnaire and that the remaining step is for the board to pass a resolution before the program issues funds.
