Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Naming Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates person-based names vs. place/concept names and flags Ho‑Chunk consultation for language-based proposals
Summary
Members balanced naming schools after people versus choosing geographic or value-based names. Several members recommended consulting the Ho‑Chunk community before advancing Ho‑Chunk language proposals; the committee also discussed whether names already used elsewhere in Wisconsin should proceed.
Committee members repeatedly debated whether to prioritize deceased local figures, place-based names, or values-based names. Several members argued that a person’s life can provide a role model for students, while others preferred place or concept names to avoid future renaming conflicts. The facilitator reminded members that the district’s policy allows up to two deceased prominent individuals among finalists and encouraged members to use the rubric when deciding.
A recurring point addressed Ho‑Chunk language proposals: members said any name drawing on the Ho‑Chunk language or heritage should have prior consultation and blessing from the Ho‑Chunk community. Chelsea said she would consult district leaders and community liaisons to ensure the appropriate tribal consultation if a Ho‑Chunk name rose to the top. "If we're going to do that, we should consult with the Ho‑Chunk community first," one member said; Chelsea agreed to follow up with an MMSD leader who works with tribal connections.
