Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the FIP Restoration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Baker and John Day FIP teams report restoration gains, monitoring data and lessons learned

Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board · July 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Presenters from the Baker Local Implementation Team and the John Day Basin Partnership updated the board on FIP outcomes: thousands of acres treated for invasive grasses and seeding in Baker; floodplain, beaver‑dam‑analog and riparian restoration across the John Day with monitoring showing stable fish abundances.

Representatives from two Focused Investment Partnerships (FIPs) updated OWEB on on‑the‑ground restoration results and implementation lessons. The Baker Local Implementation Team (Baker LIT) described voluntary landowner programs that reduced invasive annual grasses, installed large juniper‑removal projects, built a carcass disposal station to lower raven subsidies, and established monitoring via the Oregon Rangeland Monitoring Program. Shonda Zettle reported completed project totals (complete projects only) of roughly 13,000 acres of invasive-annual‑grass treatments, about 4,000 acres of broadleaf noxious‑weed control and over 8,000 acres of seeding across the Baker work area.

John Day Basin Partnership presenters summarized a decade of coordinated action: about 230 acres of floodplain restoration, installation of over 1,100 beaver‑dam analogs, protection of ~279 acres in perpetuity, and monitoring across hundreds of miles of streams. Presenters showed temperature analyses indicating some restored reaches have reduced adjusted total degree‑hours and argued that the portfolio of funding and coordinated partners has contributed to stability in native fish abundance relative to neighboring basins. Both partnerships emphasized lessons learned — cultural clearances, monitoring bandwidth, contractor capacity, and the need to budget for invasive‑weed follow‑up — and said they plan to apply for a next FIP cycle.