Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Project Costs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panelists: financing rules, prevailing wage and amenities push affordable project costs higher
Summary
Speakers explained that low-income housing tax credit financing, Davis-Bacon prevailing wage rules, environmental reviews and public-amenity requirements raise costs on affordable projects compared with market-rate construction.
Panelists at the Hood River forum laid out specific reasons affordable housing often costs more than comparable private-market housing, explaining how funding rules and public requirements increase up-front expenses.
Karen Long described the financing mix and regulatory triggers that increase costs: "The main financing tool we use to build housing is the low-income housing tax credit... it comes with a lot of legal costs, a lot of fees," she said, and added that prevailing wage requirements tied to some public funding can raise construction costs "by 20 to 30%." She also noted that projects frequently include public amenities and durable materials, and that a challenging site (for example, extensive retaining walls) increases hard construction costs.
Panelists said those higher baseline costs are one reason a local bond could be strategically valuable—local, flexible capital can pay for land or infrastructure that unlocks larger state or federal investments and improve project feasibility.
