Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Garden City council for budget reconciliation and alternatives to proposed tax hike
Summary
During the public hearing on the proposed millage, residents asked the council to publish a revenue reconciliation and to consider using surplus funds instead of a steep tax increase; council and staff explained limitations tied to prior appropriations and a recent settlement related to the fire fee.
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents used the public hearing to press the mayor and council for clearer, line-by-line budget comparisons and to urge alternatives to the proposed increase.
Amy Blackchman asked officials for a reconciliation showing total recurring revenues by source for fiscal year 2025 compared with 2026, specifically naming property taxes, fire fees, sales taxes, franchise fees, business taxes, licensing, permits, charges for service and transfers. “It doesn’t give a bottom line comparison,” she said after reviewing the online slide deck and asked where a roughly $4.9 million difference for fire-fee–related costs came from. Staff replied that the 2026 budget is online but did not provide the single consolidated reconciliation at the meeting.
Several residents questioned taxing residents to cover what they framed as city liabilities related to a fire-fee lawsuit. One resident asked why the city wouldn’t use surplus funds to reduce the increase; staff and council said the city routinely appropriates fund balance but warned that continuing to draw down reserves could harm the city’s bond rating and ability to borrow at favorable rates. The mayor and other council members explained that court decisions have changed how fire charges should be collected and that a settlement—reducing a larger potential claim to about $1.4 million—was chosen as a fiscal hedge against a risk of a much larger judgment.
Residents and council members agreed the matter is difficult and that additional finance detail would help. The council directed finance staff to update public documents to reflect the adopted rate and to follow up on requests for clearer revenue reconciliation.

