Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Zoning board delays decision on 413 Bridal Ave garage addition after survey questions and neighbor objections
Summary
The Riverhead Zoning Board of Appeals continued an appeal to legalize an unpermitted garage addition at 413 Bridal Ave after members flagged a smaller-than-reported rear setback, an unauthorized second driveway and neighbors’ objections to a proposed bathroom and home-office use; the board set a return hearing for Sept. 10.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Riverhead Zoning Board of Appeals postponed action on appeal 2026-015, a request to legalize an addition to a detached garage at 413 Bridal Avenue, after board members and neighbors raised concerns about survey accuracy, impervious-surface calculations and the structure’s proposed use.
Kevin McCray of McCray Architects, who was sworn in as the project’s architect, told the board the owners started renovating the garage without a permit and described the work as "a 13-foot side yard addition... the same front to back depth of 16 feet" that generally lines up with the existing garage. He also said the firm filed with the sewer district for a new connection but had not yet received authorization.
Board members pressed the applicant over inconsistencies in the submission. A zoning member reported a survey review showing the rear-yard distance may be about 2.32 feet — smaller than the 3.3 feet listed on the application — a discrepancy that would require an amended application and re-noticing before the board could act. The board asked for a current certified survey and clearer as-built plans before returning the matter to the agenda.
Adjacent residents also objected. One neighbor, Anna Schlatter of 423 Bridal Avenue, said she would accept an office but not a shower, stove or kitchen in the converted space, adding that the block is "a peaceful, quiet neighborhood" and that she did not want it commercialized. Another nearby resident expressed concern about strangers visiting if the space operates as a business.
The board directed code enforcement to re-inspect the property, requested the architect submit the updated survey with calculations and advised the applicants that certain unpermitted work could need removal if it cannot be legalized. The board scheduled a return hearing for Sept. 10 to allow re-noticing and follow-up inspections.

