Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tree Removal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board upholds planning commission; denies tree-removal request after questions about documented damage
Summary
A property owner asked to remove a tree he said was damaging sewer and utility lines; the board, after questioning whether the tree board inspected underground piping, upheld the planning commission and denied removal. Alderman Frasier recused from the vote.
A property owner appealing the tree board’s decision asked the board to allow removal of a tree he says is damaging sewer lines and constraining redevelopment. The appellant said the underground piping had been repeatedly repaired and that the tree’s roots interfere with planned construction. He told the board he would replant and landscape after removal to meet the city’s standards.
Board members asked how the damage to pipes had been verified; no camera inspection was documented in the tree board notes, and several members said they did not see evidence sufficient to overturn the field inspection. One board member summarized, "I don't see enough evidence here to overturn their decision without more information." Alderman Frasier recused from the vote because he owns property adjacent to the parcel. After discussion the board voted to uphold the tree board and planning commission decision denying removal.
The appellant was told he may pursue a hardship request through the planning commission if he believes the necessary relief remains, and the board emphasized adherence to the tree board’s field inspections absent stronger evidence of immediate infrastructure damage.
