Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Restorative Practices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves restorative-practices contract after divided debate on discipline and outcomes
Summary
After lengthy debate between trustees and educators about effectiveness and consequences, the board authorized award of a restorative-practices services contract to a vendor recommended by staff; vote passed with one trustee voting no.
The board considered authorization to award a restorative-practices services contract following a request-for-proposal process. Staff described evaluation criteria (direct student services, circle facilitation, family engagement, collaboration and data reporting) and said the recommended vendor scored highest on the rubric and had prior references.
Trustees and educators voiced divergent views. Trustee Lebsack opposed funding, arguing restorative approaches without firm consequences could worsen classroom disruptions; she said recent studies and teacher anecdotes suggested the approach can reduce suspensions without reducing misconduct. Trustee Dr. Alvarez and others defended restorative practices as part of a multi-tiered system of supports, stressing training and accountability: "No kid is a throwaway kid," he said, urging continued investment in training with fidelity and clear consequences.
Following discussion and public comment recognizing long-standing community partners, the board authorized the award (vote recorded as 4 yes, 1 no). Trustees asked staff to report back on implementation and outcomes as the work proceeds.
