Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Text Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Proposal to cut church setback in R‑2 district fails after hours of public comment
Summary
A proposed text amendment to reduce side/rear setbacks for existing churches and schools in R‑2 neighborhoods drew lengthy public testimony and failed to win a recommendation from the Planning & Zoning Board.
Get email alerts on the Text Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Planning & Zoning Board considered a controversial text amendment (ZT‑7‑25) that would let existing churches and schools in the R‑2 single‑family residential district make additions at a reduced side/rear setback — no closer than 10 feet or no closer than existing buildings — rather than the standard 35‑foot requirement for new structures. Staff said the change targets longstanding, nonconforming houses of worship that cannot otherwise expand without buying additional land or encountering an impossible variance pathway.
The proposal prompted intense public comment. Opponents described a proposed 9,000‑square‑foot sanctuary and warned of increased traffic, on‑street parking, stormwater runoff and loss of neighborhood character. As one neighbor testified, “If you approve this change, how in the heck are they gonna know? ... This proposal will allow non‑residential entities to encroach in R‑2 zones.” Supporters — including members of the subject church and the Southeast Volusia Chamber of Commerce — said the congregation provides local services, outreach and disaster relief and that modest relief would let long‑established institutions remain viable. Applicant representative Pete Thompson said the amendment is intended to help existing churches continue service without requiring demolition or untenable redesign.
After extended deliberation, the board voted and the motion to recommend the amendment failed. Board members cited neighborhood character, unanswered questions about process and the scale of potential new construction as reasons to deny a recommendation. The item will not advance to the City Commission with a favorable recommendation.
