Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Naming Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Beltrami County board splits on memorial‑naming ban, delays decision to next meeting
Summary
The board considered a proposed resolution to prohibit naming public infrastructure; debate split commissioners and a roll call ended 2–2, prompting the board to postpone action and add the item to the next agenda so all members can attend.
The Beltrami County Board debated a proposed resolution (referred to as 'proposal 2') that would prohibit naming county buildings, roads or bridges as memorial designations. Commissioner Carlson moved to approve the policy; Commissioner Gazzewig seconded. Commissioners argued over whether a blanket prohibition prevents future recognition of worthy individuals or avoids politicized naming decisions by boards whose memberships change over time.
Commissioner Carlson, who moved the resolution, said the county would be better served by avoiding naming choices that would leave decisions to a changing board: "It just seems like to be the most consistent, we'd be better served to not do any naming like that," he said, noting the board's changing membership and the potential for contested decisions. Another commissioner pushed back, saying commemorations (for veterans or lifetime achievement) are a legitimate way for local governments to recognize service and that the Adopt a Highway program is a separate avenue for recognition.
After discussion, the chair called a roll‑call vote. The transcript records the votes as: Commissioner Carlson — yes; Commissioner Gould — no; Commissioner Gottlieb — yes; the chair — no. With a 2–2 tie, the board did not adopt the resolution. The board agreed to place the policy back on the next meeting agenda so all members can be present for a final decision.
The discussion referenced related programs and processes the board may use instead of naming (for example, the Adopt a Highway program and state scenic‑byway designations) and noted that some naming (such as unnamed lakes renamed through environmental services) falls outside county policy and remains possible under separate procedures.
