Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Communications topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates purpose of new communications role and public information officer model
Summary
Council members weighed using a part‑time communications coordinator for routine outreach versus designating a public information officer (PAO) model for incident response; members emphasized linking social posts to the official city website and recommended a trial approach.
Council members debated whether the part‑time communications coordinator should operate mainly for routine outreach or be structured like a public information officer (PAO) to manage major incidents and be the official voice of the city.
A staff member described the PAO concept and its role in the National Incident Management System: "The role of that public information officer specified in the NIMS, National Incident Command, system." Supporters said the city would benefit from factual, timely information on emergencies and notable projects; others cautioned that routine social posting can attract disputes and should be limited to directing people back to the city omain.
Council members also discussed technical limits to livestreaming: previous camera setups lacked sound and upgrading would require capital investment. The council emphasized the coordinator should "refer back to the city page" rather than post all material across platforms, to reduce duplication and reliance on informal metrics like three‑second social media views.
Several members favored a temporary pilot to determine whether a coordinator would measurably improve information flow and community engagement before committing to long‑term costs.
