Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Weed council directs rewrite of short-term rental rules, considers cap and grandfathering
Summary
Council pulled an ordinance from the consent calendar to debate new short-term rental rules. Staff and council discussed removing 'runs-with-the-land' conditional-use permits, capping permits (proposed cap 20 with grandfathering), and adding emergency permitting during wildfire season; council sent the item back to planning for revisions.
The council moved item B from the consent agenda to full discussion after members asked for more time to consider changes to the proposed amendment to chapter 5.24 of the Weed Municipal Code that would restrict issuance and renewal of short-term vacation rental permits. Planning staff told the council the commission raised concerns about neighborhood character and housing supply and asked the council for direction on several specific edits.
Council members discussed several concrete options: remove the conditional-use-permit provision that allows a permit to run with the land; convert approvals to two-year permits with renewal rather than permanent land-based permits; create a numerical cap (a number discussed repeatedly was 20) while grandfathering the 15–17 existing permit holders; and include an emergency permit pathway to allow short-term use for disaster response. City attorney Mackenzie recommended sending changes back to the planning commission if they alter zoning code elements. The council voted to send the ordinance back to planning staff and counsel to incorporate the agreed changes and return for a first reading once drafted.
Several council members emphasized fairness for current permit holders and asked staff to craft grandfathering language and a review process while adding enforcement and periodic review provisions. Police and code-enforcement staff reported only occasional complaints about short-term rentals; staff recommended a two-year permit with condition reviews. The council did not enact a final ordinance but directed staff to draft a revised ordinance reflecting the council’s direction and to return for further readings and public notice.
