Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Decorum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chair urges formal titles, points-of-order and addressing president to keep meetings orderly
Summary
Chair reviewed meeting decorum and Robert's Rules guidance—use formal titles, recognize speakers by raised hand, use point of order for procedural errors, and address the president (not each other) during disagreements; closed sessions require a two-thirds vote.
The chair reviewed parliamentary procedures and meeting decorum intended to keep board meetings professional and efficient. Members were asked to use formal titles when speaking, to raise hands to be recognized during discussion, and to address comments to the president rather than directly to one another in order to reduce heated exchanges.
"For our meetings, I'm gonna suggest that we use titles just to remain professionalism," the chair said, giving examples such as "board member Priess, superintendent Jensen." The chair also explained the point-of-order mechanism: if a member believes something is out of order they should call "point of order" and the chair will rule on it or put it to a board vote. On closed sessions the chair said personnel matters should be handled privately and that a vote of 0.667 (two-thirds) is required to enter a closed session.
Scott and others added procedural detail about how motions open discussion and how to avoid speaking a second time before everyone wishing to comment has had their turn. The session was instructional; no formal disciplinary or procedural actions were taken during the work meeting.
