Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Annexation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission forwards annexation of 486 River Sands Road to city council

Moab City Planning Commission · January 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission voted 3-0 to forward a positive recommendation on Ordinance 2026-01 to annex 486 River Sands Road into Moab, noting a pre-annexation agreement that sets split zoning and that neighbor letters protested proposed density (approx. 20 units) and utility concerns.

The Moab City Planning Commission voted unanimously on Jan. 8 to forward a recommendation to Moab City Council on Ordinance 2026-01, a petition to annex 486 River Sands Road. Staff noted the property is subject to a 2024 pre-annexation agreement that specifies a split zoning (C-2 commercial and R-3 residential) and includes an employment-household restriction for any residential units on part of the parcel.

Planning coordinator Corey Shurtleff told the commission that two letters had been submitted by neighbors; both letters "do not oppose the annexation itself" but protest the inclusion of a specific number of housing units and related development standards. Staff said the two letters are likely not qualifying objections for the planning-commission step but will be acknowledged and more appropriately considered at the city-council public hearing. Ben Bird, representing the applicant, described the history of the pre-annexation agreement and said the proposed residential portion would be workforce housing, while the commercial portion is intended to maintain existing commercial uses.

Commissioner Carolyn Conant moved to forward a positive recommendation; Commissioner Jill Tatton seconded. The motion passed 3-0. Staff said the proposed site plan shows about 20 units and that utilities, circulation and density will be resolved through the review and building-permit processes. "While we do not oppose the annexation itself, we are formally protesting the inclusion of a specific number of housing units in this annexation proposal," staff read from the neighbors' letters summarizing their concerns about density and sewer utility impacts.

The commission’s action was a recommendation to city council; final annexation approval and any contested development standards will be addressed at the council public hearing.