Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Salary Setting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves change to salary-setting process to align evaluations with fiscal decisions
Summary
The board voted to adopt a revised salary-setting authority process that aligns performance evaluations with fiscal-year decision timing; staff may bring specific increases after executive-session review of employee performance as needed.
Get email alerts on the Salary Setting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Karen Durant, staff to the board, presented recommended changes to the board's salary-setting process, including aligning performance evaluations with fiscal decision timing and applying consultant-recommended market adjustments previously discussed.
"The current process aligns with a calendar year evaluation. For the process to reflect the most current performance of team members, consideration should be given to changing the process to have up-to-date evaluations aligned with fiscal year or just before board decisions are made," Karen Durant said as she reviewed the proposed sequencing.
A board member moved to adopt the board salary-setting authority process per the presentation; the motion was seconded and adopted by voice vote. The change gives staff authority to realign evaluation timing; any specific salary increases would be discussed in executive session and brought back for board action as needed.
Durant noted the board previously adopted market adjustments (an 8% adjustment for executive director and deputy director roles and 2.6% for research and policy positions) and said next steps include possible executive-session reviews and submission of a decision package to OFM when appropriate.
