Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tolling topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission directs bi‑state tolling subcommittee to refine I‑5 bridge rate options and public engagement
Summary
The Washington State Transportation Commission approved posting of guidance for a bi‑state tolling subcommittee to review toll‑rate scenarios, financing options, low‑income discounts and traffic diversion forecasts for the Interstate 5 bridge replacement. Commissioners stressed the subcommittee is advisory and must confirm financial sufficiency before advancing scenarios.
The Washington State Transportation Commission approved staff recommendations to post a document directing the bi‑state tolling subcommittee to review toll‑rate scenarios and related policy choices for the Interstate 5 bridge replacement project. Chair Jim Restucci opened the item and staff presented four scenarios from a Level‑3 traffic and revenue study and a proposed work plan covering rate schedules, timing for a low‑income discount, rate‑escalation options and projected traffic diversion.
Carl Seed, deputy director (staff), told commissioners the direction is meant to help the subcommittee and the full commissions prepare for future rate‑setting work: “These topics are intended to provide guidance to the subcommittee, particularly over the next six months so that they are in a position to provide the feedback you need,” he said. The presentation emphasized the material is advisory, not an adopted commission policy, and will be posted publicly after clarifying edits.
Commissioners asked for clearer scope and limits. Commissioner Matt Ransom cautioned that some matters raised by the public—particularly tolling on I‑205 in Washington—are outside the statutory purview of this subcommittee and are meant only as informational inputs to forecasting, not action items. “I don't want the bi‑state subcommittee refereeing or validating traffic forecasts or exceeding its advisory role,” Ransom said. Several commissioners pressed staff to ensure any recommended scenario demonstrate financial sufficiency for each state.
After discussion, Commissioner Gail Tarleton moved to adopt staff recommendations for public posting of the document, noting staff would add subheaders and clarifications based on today’s comments; the motion passed by voice vote. The commission directed staff to vet edits with subcommittee members before publishing and to treat the product as guidance for the advisory body rather than a binding decision.
