Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors warn of runoff, density and construction quality at Kennebec Road hearing
Summary
Multiple abutters told the planning board they opposed the Ayers Corner 24-unit plan, citing past contractor performance, increased runoff through wetlands and concerns about snow storage and traffic. The developer acknowledged past mistakes and said new subcontractors are in place.
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the April 8 public hearing several nearby residents spoke against the proposed 24-unit Ayers Corner development on Kennebec Road, emphasizing three recurring concerns: increased stormwater runoff, a perceived excessive density compared with a previously approved 10-unit plan, and the developer’s construction quality record.
Chris Patterson (166 Kennebec) told the board he is not opposed to development per se but worried ‘‘going from 10 units to 24’’ and said the developer ‘‘has a track record’’ of leaving work incomplete. David Watts (28 Mayo) focused on water and said that about ‘‘2 acres that will not absorb anything’’ will increase runoff to his property unless swales or berms are added. Rich Armstrong (109 Kennebec) said the density was too high for the area and asked the board to consider scaling the project back.
The applicant and a contractor representative pushed back on the criticism. Walter Pierce, who identified himself as with A Plus Electric and said he has overseen site maintenance, said subcontractor quality has improved. The developer (identifying as Natapong) acknowledged earlier mistakes by subcontractors, said he has hired different crews and accepted responsibility, and offered to work with town staff and abutters on buffers and site oversight.
Staff and board members repeatedly emphasized that building quality and code enforcement are handled through the town’s building inspection process, and that the planning board’s review at this stage centered on subdivision and zoning standards and compliance with application requirements.
