Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission adopts Water Use and Preservation Element after debate over climate references
Summary
After extended public comment and commission debate about climate science and references to other planning documents, the commission adopted the revised Water Use and Preservation Element with additional graphs showing demand‑reduction scenarios; vote was 6–1 (Hadeem opposed).
Planning director Andrew Jackson presented the Water Use and Preservation Element for adoption, telling the commission that the chapter had been revised to include graphs demonstrating the effect of demand reduction. "What it does is it adds graphs that detail what could happen if there is conservation and reduction on demand," Jackson said, and described coordination with the Moab‑Spanish Valley water resource management planning work.
Public comment and some commissioners pressed for stronger climate language and for explicit citations to scientific studies; Commissioner Hadeem said she had repeatedly sought references to the available science and preferred explicit climate‑informed language in the plan. Jackson and other commissioners said the element was written to align with and not duplicate the detailed resource‑management plan, which addresses many technical questions. The commission voted to adopt the element with the revised Section 5 (the graphs) by a 6–1 margin, with Commissioner Hadeem recorded in opposition and several commissioners urging future updates and additional references to the supporting technical work.
