Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Visitor Passes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Proposal to change visitor pass replacement fees fails for lack of a second, then tabled for work session
Summary
A motion to introduce an amendment to the town’s visitor pass replacement cost failed for lack of a second; the council then voted to table further discussion to a later work session.
Council Member McCauley moved to approve introduction of an amendment to the visitor pass replacement cost but the motion received no second and failed. McCauley then made a second motion, which Council Member Turberville seconded, to table further discussion to a later work session. That motion carried unanimously with Ayes: Turberville, McCauley, Serrano, Johnson.
The minutes show the initial motion to introduce the amendment did not proceed because it lacked a second. The record of the subsequent procedural motion to table indicates council chose to defer the matter rather than adopt changes at this meeting. No replacement-fee amounts or draft language were recorded in the minutes.
