Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs court-ordered remediation and liens for long-standing lakeshore violations
Summary
Council reviewed an enforcement case where a property owner failed to complete ordered shoreline remediation; staff described moving to a bid-ready restoration plan, seeking a court order to enter and complete work, levying costs as a lien, and pursuing collections if necessary.
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The council reviewed enforcement options for a property with unresolved shoreline and erosion violations after the owner failed to complete required remedial work and appeals were filed.
Staff described the practical steps: hire a designer to prepare a bid-ready restoration plan with cost estimates suitable for contracting, ask a court for an entry order if the owner refuses permission, complete the work under contract, and then place a lien on the property for costs. Council noted prior fines (the transcript refers to a $500/day fine capped at $15,000 and that that amount is already in collections for some previously assessed charges). Legal counsel (Ross) will evaluate the likelihood of a favorable court order before the city proceeds.
Council discussed the cost-benefit balance — potential legal costs versus the environmental and lake-protection need — and asked staff to return with a clearer cost estimate, a timeline for design and bidding, and Ross’s assessment of the court likelihood. Chair noted that a large assessed lien on a high-value property offers reasonable security for recovery, but warned the process can take months and could result in litigation.

