Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Completeness topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board rules Cunningham application incomplete, deems Talpas lot-line adjustment complete; Anastasio absent
Summary
The planning board found the Cunningham minor-subdivision application incomplete for missing checklist items and escrow/fees, approved a completeness determination for the Talpas lot-line adjustment (with waivers) and took no action on Anastasio's application due to the applicant's absence.
The planning board reviewed three subdivision/completeness items on July 22. For the Cunningham minor-subdivision (Block 86, Lot 101), staff reported a missing checklist and incomplete fee submissions and recommended the application be deemed incomplete; the board voted to declare the application incomplete pending submission of the missing items.
For the Talpas minor-subdivision and lot-line adjustment (Block 90, Lots 1 & 2), staff described requested waivers and one required variance for minimum lot width; the board determined the application contained sufficient information to move forward to public hearing with temporary waivers and voted to deem the application complete. The board called the Anastasio Subdivision (Block 95, Lot 8) and noted the applicant (Mr. Peck) was not present, so no action was taken on that application.
A board member emphasized procedural time limits: if the board does not explicitly deem an application complete or incomplete, it can be deemed complete automatically after 45 days; staff recommended declaring applications incomplete when materials are missing to preserve municipal review rights. The actions on Cunningham and Talpas were recorded by roll-call votes.
