Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ballot Initiatives topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Panel advances measure setting 10% signature threshold and other limits for ballot initiatives

Mississippi Senate Elections Committee · February 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee advanced SCR 5 18, proposing that ballot-initiative petitions require signatures equal to 10% of active registered voters (approximately 170,000 signatures) and capping signatures so no more than one-third may come from any single congressional district; it also includes a reverse repealer and a clause preserving the right to life.

The Senate Elections Committee advanced SCR 5 18, a proposed constitutional amendment and statutory vehicle designed to reestablish a statewide ballot-initiative process with updated thresholds and limitations.

The committee chair said the measure ties the petition requirement to 10% of active registered voters — roughly 170,000 signatures based on current rolls — rather than to turnout in a prior gubernatorial election. The chair also described several structural limits: a reverse repealer, a prohibition in the measure that no initiative may deprive a human being of the right to life, and a rule that no more than 0.333 (one-third) of signatures may originate in any single congressional district.

Senator Tate raised a legal question about severability, asking whether the preservation-of-life lines could be struck in court while leaving the rest of the measure intact. The chair said the draft does not include a severability clause and promised to provide a floor response and follow up. Senator Blunt urged the committee to consider raising the legislative override threshold to two-thirds (0.667) instead of 60% and warned that placing an alternative on the ballot could cause unnecessary voter confusion.

Why it matters: The proposal changes how initiatives qualify for the ballot and how the Legislature may later alter initiative-driven statutes, which could reshape opportunities for citizen-initiated lawmaking in the state.

The committee adopted the committee substitute for SCR 5 18 by voice vote and will report the measure for further consideration.