Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends council approve focused zoning amendments
Summary
The Box Elder Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend City Council approve focused amendments to the zoning ordinance—including renaming residential districts to reflect density, clarifying carport and ADU rules, adjusting parking requirements, and formalizing commercial landscaping standards—after commissioners removed the single‑family tree mandate from the recommendation.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Box Elder Planning Commission voted to recommend that City Council approve a package of targeted amendments to the city's zoning ordinance (ord. referenced in meeting materials as "ordinance 7 6 5"). The motion to recommend approval, as amended, passed on a roll call vote with all members present voting yes and one commissioner absent.
Marley Patton, planning director, summarized the package as a "focused" set of updates that rename residential districts to reflect density (R1 low density to R4 high density), clarify landscaping and carport definitions, adjust off‑street parking standards that were miswritten in the 2022 overhaul, and add a commercial landscaping point table benchmarked to nearby municipalities. "We changed the naming to align with the density," Patton said, arguing the changes make rules clearer and more consistent across the code.
The commission solicited and verbalized a short list of specific amendments (typographical corrections; remove a 20‑foot manufactured‑home spacing requirement from R4 standards; omit the residential single‑family tree planting requirement from the recommendation; update carport references and setbacks; set a minimum utility easement distance for carports; and remove "plus employee spaces as needed" under office parking). After those amendments were read into the record and motioned, the commission carried the recommendation to City Council by unanimous vote of members present.
The recommendation does not itself change the municipal code until Council action. The next procedural step is a Council hearing and vote; staff and commissioners said the City Council will receive the commission's recommendation and the accompanying amendment list for consideration.
