Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cannabis Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors advance cannabis ordinance changes, add surety-bond tiers and employee-definition language
Summary
After extended public comment and supervisor debate, the board directed staff to add surety-bond tiers and a permanent-employee definition to the draft commercial cannabis ordinance and advanced the amended ordinance to a second-reading hearing on July 28 at 1 p.m.; action carried 4-0.
The Lake County Board of Supervisors advanced a revised commercial cannabis ordinance to a second-reading hearing on July 28 at 1 p.m. after supervisors and members of the public debated several substantive provisions, including the length of permits, background-check requirements for employees, and surety-bond levels to secure abatement costs.
Director Marya Turner walked the board through typographical corrections to code citations and explained that most of the edits were non-substantive. Public speakers—including Angela Amaral and other cannabis-program critics—urged the board to retain a 10-year permit term, restore broad background-check requirements and increase the surety-bond minimums so the county could fund cleanup or abatement when operators violate the ordinance.
Supervisors negotiated a set of changes staff could draft for a second reading: copying surety-bond language from the county’s Industrial Hemp ordinance (minimum $5,000 for cultivation under 10 acres; minimum $10,000 for cultivation of 10 acres or more; additional $1,000 per acre for sites 25 acres and larger) and adding a definition for “permanent employee—cannabis” (a worker in an ongoing employment relationship with no predetermined end date, typically on the employer’s payroll), to address concerns about background checks and employee categories.
County counsel advised the board that those amendments could be incorporated for a second reading without renoticing as long as the changes were specific and the public was given the substance of proposed amendments; the board passed a motion to advance the draft ordinance as amended to the next meeting and set the next hearing for July 28 at 1 p.m. The motion to advance the ordinance carried 4-0.
Board members also agreed to continue deliberation of the 10-year permit question at a future session with all five supervisors present to ensure a full-board discussion.
Several revocation items that had been listed for today were withdrawn and sent back to the Planning Commission for process review earlier in the meeting.
