Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Deannexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
De‑annexation request raises zoning‑compatibility and impact‑fee questions
Summary
Two parcels seeking de‑annexation from Holly Springs back into Cherokee County would revert from city R‑20 to county zoning; staff warned the parcels would create nonconforming lots relative to adjacent AG and R‑80 zoning, and commissioners asked staff to analyze zoning, impact‑fee and right‑of‑way complications before taking a vote.
County planning staff presented a de‑annexation request affecting two parcels that had been annexed into the City of Holly Springs and rezoned to R‑20. Staff told commissioners the county’s adjacent zoning (AG and R‑80) is inconsistent with R‑20 and that accepting de‑annexation could create a string of nonconforming lots; staff recommended careful review because the parcels were rezoned under the city and later subdivided.
Applicant Joshua Johnson, who purchased one parcel in 2022, told the board he was surprised to find his lot had been annexed earlier and said being part of the city feels “spotty and weird” compared with neighbors. "I purchased a property after it was already went through all that process... I just saw that most of my surrounding properties weren't City Of Holly Springs," Johnson said. Commissioners asked for follow‑up on zoning alternatives, potential impact fees, right‑of‑way ownership and whether de‑annexation would set an undesirable precedent; they deferred a final decision until staff returns with more information.
