Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners press developers on water, fire protection and stormwater for proposed Sanctuary Farms subdivision

Cherokee County Board of Commissioners · August 20, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Planning staff described a proposal for 56 lots on roughly 461 acres; commissioners and staff flagged stormwater, fire hydrant requirements and the cost and logistics of supplying looped water service as core unresolved issues that could change how the project is permitted.

Margaret Stallings, Planning and Zoning Director, presented the Sanctuary Farms concept as a rural‑lot subdivision that would comprise 56 lots on about 461 acres and asked the board for direction on options to proceed. "He's proposing to develop 56 lots on 461 acres," Stallings said when introducing the plan, and she told the board the project currently anticipates private wells or septic rather than county water.

Staff told commissioners the project squarely meets the code definition of a major subdivision (more than 10 lots and shared infrastructure), which triggers comprehensive land‑disturbance, stormwater and tree‑survey requirements. Stallings said the applicant has asked to be exempt from certain stormwater quality and reduction standards while still meeting quantity controls; staff warned that pushing stormwater compliance to individual lot owners could create inconsistent hydrology studies, burdens on county planning resources and possible challenges with the Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District and the Georgia EPD. Commissioners repeatedly flagged fire protection and water service as the principal obstacles: hydrants and looping the system could require tens of thousands of feet of pipe and substantial cost, while alternative options like residential sprinkler systems or tanks raise questions about long‑term reliability and code compliance.