Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves curb‑ramp contract, large road payment and parking‑lot payment

Morrisville Borough Council · July 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council voted to award the 2026 CDBG curb‑ramp contract to Earl Asphalt for $211,213, approved a $1,049,879 payment application tied to the road program after a $110,107 change order, and approved a $292,884.75 payment for the Morrisville lot project.

Council approved three public‑works items during the July 21 meeting: awarding the 2026 CDBG curb‑ramp project to Earl Asphalt Company, accepting a change order that reduced the road‑program contract, and approving a payment application for the Morrisville lot pavement and drainage project.

Engineer Jacob Briggs (S13) told council the borough received a $190,000 Bucks County CDBG award and the recommended low bid plus alternate would make full use of that grant. He said the recommended award to Earl Asphalt totals $211,213, which includes a borough match of $21,213 to avoid returning grant funds.

On the road program, council approved a change order that reduces the contract by $110,107.13 and approved payment application #1 for $1,049,879.08 to James D. Morrissey Inc.; the borough manager (S3) said his recommendation is to pay from the general fund unencumbered balance. Council voted to approve the change order and payment unanimously.

Council also approved payment application #1 in the amount of $292,884.75 to G&B Construction for the Morrisville lot pavement and drainage project as recommended by the borough engineer. Leaders said retainage is being held until punch‑list items are complete on other projects.

Each motion passed by recorded voice or unanimous assent; the motions were entered per the engineer’s recommendations and the solicitor’s procedural guidance.