Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Boardwalks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Boardwalk applicant submits peer‑review response; commission closes hearing to deliberate
Summary
A revised plan and a peer‑review by Brian McCormick were presented for a proposed boardwalk at 61 Shoestring Bay Road. Commissioners expressed unresolved concerns about cumulative effects to salt marshes and closed the public hearing to deliberate on August 6.
Get email alerts on the Boardwalks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chuck Rowland of Capen Islands Engineering summarized changes to the Shoestring Bay Road boardwalk plan and submitted a July 9 revision and a response to cumulative‑impact comments. He said the peer review from Brian McCormick concluded the proposal was unlikely to cause significant hydrologic impacts to salt marsh flow patterns. "The report concluded there are not likely to be significant impacts to salt marsh hydrology flow patterns," Rowland said.
Commissioners pressed that cumulative impacts require broader system‑level analysis, and multiple members requested more time to review the applicant's written response; several commissioners noted they had just received the lengthy response that morning and asked for 21 days to evaluate it. The commission voted to close the public hearing and deliberate at the August 6 meeting.

