Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the General Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee postpones Bill 176 to refine general‑plan amendment procedures
Summary
Committee discussed Bill 176 to codify general‑plan amendment procedures (10‑year comprehensive review, interim amendments, public workshops) and voted to postpone the measure to Aug. 4 to address planning‑department concerns, notice issues and timeline wording.
Clerk introduced Bill 176, which would codify the county’s general‑plan amendment procedures, require a comprehensive review every 10 years, outline interim amendment rules, and clarify the roles and timelines for the planning director, planning commissions and county council.
Supporters said the change aims to remove ambiguity that in the prior comprehensive review limited the council’s ability to propose or adopt substantive amendments. Planning Director Jeff Darrow urged clarifications — including retaining the historical 12/05/1971 reference, preserving a notice to property owners in some circumstances, and lengthening certain review timelines — and the makers agreed to revise language. Council member Holika Inaba moved to postpone Bill 176 to the Aug. 4 committee meeting to work with planning on the suggested edits; the motion passed with nine ayes.
