Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Village Business Zone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
P&Z to release written responses on Village Business Zone questions after public feedback
Summary
Following public feedback on the Village Business Zone expansion, the commission voted to release written responses to queries (including those from business owner Richard Hamilton) and to conduct further work sessions, update handouts, and seek assessor clarification on tax impacts.
The commission reviewed public feedback from a June 25 informational session on proposed expansions to the Village Business Zone (VRBZ). Commissioners identified several next steps on July 23: clarify industrial-use definitions, prepare written responses to public questions, hold additional work sessions, provide updated handouts and mailings to affected property owners, and obtain assessor clarification that zoning changes do not alter tax classification.
Commissioner Matthew Macchi moved, and Doug Cohn seconded, a motion to release written responses to Richard Hamilton's specific inquiries; the motion passed unanimously. Richard Hamilton's submitted list of questions — read into the record — asked, among other things, whether a VRBZ change would make 115 Railroad St.'s use as a warehouse a pre-existing nonconforming use and whether expansion of such uses should be included under special permit authority. Hamilton requested written responses he can rely on for future enforcement and planning clarity: "If the VRBZ goes through, does my use of 115 Railroad St as a warehouse become a 'pre-existing non conforming use'?"
