Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meetings Training topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Presenter: Annual open-meetings training stresses legal duties and penalties
Summary
At a joint city-and-school training required by South Dakota law, the presenter reviewed notice, quorum and executive-session rules and warned that violating 'SCCL 1-25' can be a criminal offense punishable by fines or jail.
Get email alerts on the Open Meetings Training topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The joint meeting of city and school board officials met for the mandatory open-meetings training required under South Dakota law. Chair called the session to order and the Presenter led the training, noting the state attorney general’s open-meeting pamphlet is available as a reference.
The Presenter said the statutory requirement exists to preserve public participation, and emphasized legal risk for noncompliance. "So, if you violate SCCL 1 dash 25, it's a crime. It's an act of crime that you can go to jail for and be fined for," the Presenter said, urging officials to follow notice and quorum rules.
The instruction covered definitions of a public meeting, best practices for posting notices and packet access, and a review of recent open-meetings commission findings. The Presenter referenced local cases the commission reviewed to illustrate common mistakes and recommended conservative practices — such as posting notices and avoiding deliberation outside open sessions — to reduce enforcement risk.
The training concluded with an offer to take questions and a reminder that formal actions must be taken in open session; the meeting then moved to adjournment.

