Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates using FEMA reimbursement to pay bond bank loan, opts to segregate funds pending clarification
Summary
Staff reported a roughly $658,000 FEMA deposit and bond-bank advice to delay repayment; the board discussed options and agreed to place reimbursements in a separate checking account and seek clarification from the town's bond-bank contact before making a payoff decision.
Board members reviewed recent FEMA payments and options for managing outstanding bond-bank loans and operating lines of credit.
Staff member (S6) said a recent FEMA deposit of roughly $658,000 arrived and reported that a bond-bank contact (Ken) "highly suggested that we do not pay it back yet," advising the town could wait until it has received 50% of expected reimbursements or until a $1,000,000 threshold is reached before beginning loan paydown.
The board discussed retaining a $200,000 operating line (of which about $20,000 had been used) while using the bond-bank loan for larger project advances. Some members expressed concern about paying down loans immediately versus holding funds to cover ongoing project expenses and reimbursements owed by FEMA. Committee member (S3) pressed for clarification on which projects the FEMA deposits covered (examples mentioned included Bridge 6, Mud Hollow and Burrington Bridal Road).
Chair (S1) proposed and the board agreed in principle to open a separate checking account to hold FEMA reimbursements so they do not mix with operating funds, and to get a clearer accounting from the town's finance contact (Keith) before making decisions on loan paydown. The board asked staff to report back with precise reimbursement allocations and recommended next steps at the next regular meeting.
