Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals Flooding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board trims language linking short‑term rentals to resource strain, discusses setbacks after recent flooding
Summary
Members recommended removing speculative claims tying short‑term rentals to town resource strain, decided to use neutral language that growth has 'increased' traffic, and discussed confirming a 100‑foot setback from waterways following recent flooding.
While editing the town plan, members debated language that linked an increase in short‑term rentals to pressure on town natural resources. Several members said the connection was speculative and recommended removing that phrasing; Chair (S1) suggested deleting the lines that specifically blamed short‑term rentals and instead noting that growth and tourism have contributed to increased development and traffic in some areas.
The group also discussed flood risk and existing zoning setbacks. Committee member (S2) and others recalled recent years of flooding and recommended confirming or strengthening a 100‑foot setback from waterways (previously 50 feet in the draft). Members agreed to check existing language elsewhere in the plan and to ensure the flooding/setback language appears in the appropriate section.
