Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents question new short-term rental limits as Selectboard defends ordinance

Town of Londonderry Selectboard · May 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Residents raised concerns that a proposed short-term rental amendment — including a one-year wait for new owners and annual caps on rental nights — could lower home values and hurt local service providers; the Selectboard said the change reflects community input on safety and absentee 'party houses.'

Several town residents pressed the Londonderry Selectboard on a proposed short-term rental (STR) ordinance amendment during public comment on May 5, saying the changes could have economic side effects for homeowners and local service providers.

Resident Dan McKenna said he agreed with the ordinance's added safety requirements but questioned two elements: the one-year waiting period before new owners may rent and whether an economic impact study had been completed. McKenna said the limits on yearly rental nights could reduce potential rental income and therefore future home values, and he indicated he would file an appeal.

STR property owner Barthley Thomas asked what prompted the amendment and noted that many STRs are locally owned as business opportunities. Thomas argued that other local businesses do not face caps on operating days and warned reduced rental days could hurt house cleaners, maintenance firms and similar local vendors. "Many STR are owned by locals as business opportunities," Thomas said in his remarks to the board.

Selectboard members, including Chair Thomas Cavanagh and member Martha Dale, responded that the ordinance was drafted from community feedback aimed at limiting absentee 'party houses' while balancing growth and safety. Dale said the STR Committee reviewed practices in other Vermont communities and nationally and tried to balance economic and safety concerns. The board did not vote on the ordinance at the May 5 meeting; public comment and the threat of an appeal were recorded.