Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Committee Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Debate over committee structure surfaces as members and planners discuss potential reorganization
Summary
Members debated a planning‑board proposal and potential reorganization of Dighton's stormwater oversight, including whether the committee should remain under the Board of Health, be appointed by selectmen, or operate independently; speakers emphasized EPA reporting requirements and recommended studying other towns' models.
A sustained discussion at the July 21 meeting focused on how stormwater oversight should be structured in Dighton. Ralph Hall and several members raised concerns about communication among departments and whether the committee should remain as currently organized under the Board of Health or be restructured as an appointed committee under the Board of Selectmen.
"The bottom line is, what is the best way to handle stormwater management for the town of Dighton?" Chair Nancy Gulot asked as members recounted the committee's history and the EPA‑driven reasons for maintaining effective oversight. Members noted the committee's MS4 reporting responsibilities to EPA and that the current bylaw and regulations are grant‑funded and near completion; several speakers recommended reviewing Middleborough's model and other towns before final decisions.
Planning Board communications—specifically a letter drafted by the Planning Board chairman that some members said incorrectly implied board consensus—were criticized for causing confusion. Speakers urged better interdepartmental notification (including permitting IT improvements so every department is tagged on permit submissions), and agreed to examine options and professional structures before finalizing regulatory language.
