Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Commission topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council postpones Planning Commission appointments after packet discrepancy flagged
Summary
City Attorney Dan Curtis flagged a discrepancy in the published packet regarding Planning Commission appointments and offered to draft a code update; the mayor recommended postponing approval and the council voted to postpone the recommendations to the next meeting.
City Attorney Dan Curtis told the council there was a discrepancy in the published packet about Planning Commission appointments and offered to draft a code update to fix it. When Mayor JB Tennison asked whether the Council could approve the recommendations despite the discrepancy, Curtis replied, "yes, you have the option," but the mayor recommended postponing action until the next meeting and the council approved that postponement.
Planner Richard Hall said three applicants had applied to fill vacancies on the Planning Commission and that the applicants (named in the minutes as Suzanne, Julie and Sean) were invited to attend the Feb. 10 meeting. Hall also said he presented an introduction to a draft Critical Areas Ordinance amendment at the Feb. 3 Planning Commission meeting and that the draft will be scheduled for a public hearing on March 3.
The council approved postponing the appointment recommendations rather than acting immediately to fill the vacancies; the minutes do not record council appointments at this meeting.
