Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dunedin advances overhaul of historic-preservation rules, removes district provision
Summary
The commission approved first reading of Ordinance 25-02 to update local historic-preservation code, add a 'landmark site' option, simplify certificate-of-appropriateness procedures, and remove a proposed historic-district provision after feedback from the State and National Park Service.
The Dunedin City Commission approved first reading July 23 of a package of amendments to the city’s historic-preservation chapter of the Land Development Code intended to simplify review and add clarity for applicants.
Consultant Blair Knighting (Kimley-Horn) and planner Frances Leong Sharp reviewed the changes: a new “landmark site” definition to allow designation of an entire property (landscape plus structures) instead of only a building; a revised COA (certificate of appropriateness) matrix directing routine changes to staff or the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) instead of the city commission; and clearer notice and process rules. Knighting said the intent was to streamline review while preserving the commission’s role for major actions like demolition.
The draft originally included language to create city historic districts. After state and National Park Service review and public concerns, staff removed the district provision from the current draft. Frances Leong Sharp said the change responded to federal and state comments and to local feedback. The Local Planning Agency and the Historic Preservation Advisory Committee recommended approval; the commission voted 4–0 to advance the ordinance on first reading.
Commissioners said they support easier procedures for applicants and more detailed public education around landmark nominations. The ordinance moves to a second reading on the schedule listed by the city clerk.
