Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Yorktown board tables vote on bus-locator pilot amid safety and cost debate
Summary
Board discussed Synovia bus-locator proposals (one-, three- and five-year options), trade-offs between student-tracking features and driver workload, and whether a limited pilot is worth the roughly $27,000–$36,000 near-term cost; the board voted to table the decision one month (3–0).
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Yorktown Community Schools board debated whether to adopt Synovia bus-locator software, weighing potential safety benefits against cost and operational headaches.
Superintendent (speaking) summarized vendor proposals and pricing, saying the original 60-month proposal annualized to roughly $10,000 but represented a $52,000 commitment; he reported a one-year option would require about $27,500 upfront and a three-year option about $36,000. "We could do a one-year commitment to try this out," the superintendent said, describing options to pilot the product without a long-term lock-in.
Board members pressed on student-tracking features and driver workload. One member asked whether the system’s individual-student barcode swipe would create training and compliance issues for drivers; another said, "If there are four kids a year that we just don't know where they're at, to me that's not acceptable," arguing the district should know students' whereabouts for safety. Supporters and skeptics agreed that the proposed student-tracking piece would improve visibility but would also add operational complexity and cost.
The superintendent said some suburban districts use similar systems, and that the student-tracking element is uncommon largely due to higher costs and logistics. He noted the district's fleet is roughly 40 vehicles, which affects hardware and installation costs. Several members said they preferred a short-term pilot if the board moved forward; others urged caution while two board members were absent. The board ultimately voted to table the item for one month so the full board can participate (motion carried 3–0).

