Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Committees Transition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panel debates which committees remain in charter and whether committee policies require Select Board approval
Summary
Commissioners debated removing some advisory committees from the charter, keeping regulatory boards, and adding transition language to preserve current committee charges until Select Board or Town Meeting acts. They also discussed whether committee-developed policies should require Select Board approval.
A lengthy portion of the July 23 meeting focused on Chapter 7 and which town agencies should remain in the charter. Commissioners proposed keeping regulatory bodies (Planning, Conservation, Zoning) while moving several advisory committees (Council on Aging, Recreation, Cemetery Commission) out of the charter and into bylaw or Select Board oversight.
Committee member (S4) warned that removing charter language that currently gives committees explicit duties could 'neuter' their authority. "If we're not careful, we're taking all of these out, which are very specific," the committee member said, noting that several committees currently have explicit policy roles in the charter text. The Chair (S3) proposed transition language to preserve existing committee duties "until such time as they are addressed by Town Meeting or the Select Board," and assigned Sandy (referenced in discussion) to draft explicit transition wording.
Members also debated whether policies developed by committees should require Select Board approval; several commissioners recommended adding language requiring committee policies to be submitted to the Select Board for approval to avoid future ambiguity about implementation. The Commission agreed to hold the policy-specific language and asked members to return next week with concrete drafted wording.
No formal vote was taken; the debate concluded with the Chair asking commissioners to bring prepared language for the next meeting.
