Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Library Levy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council discusses how regional library levy could affect Bellevue property tax payers

City of Bellevue Common Council · May 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council members debated whether a proposed Big Wood River Library District levy would divert local resources and what factual information the city can provide. Council asked staff to publish neutral, city-specific cost comparisons and ballot language for Bellevue residents before the May 19 vote.

The Bellevue Common Council discussed potential local impacts of a proposed Big Wood River Library District levy during an added agenda item on May 11, 2026. Council members asked staff to compile factual, city-specific information about current city contributions and estimated levy costs so residents can make an informed decision before the May 19 vote. "It's about making sure the residents understand what it means for Bellevue," Council Member Reid said, citing a rough estimate that the levy could shift up to about $200,000 a year away from locally controlled funds.

Council members and staff clarified that the levy would be an additional tax rather than a reallocation of current property-tax revenue, and that joining a district would change governance for library services. Community Development Director Brian Parker noted the levy proposal includes ballot language and that the Big Wood River Library District has published median cost estimates; council asked staff to pull the district materials and show Bellevue-specific figures. Some council members warned the public discussion was becoming one-sided and suggested a neutral informational mailer or web posting indicating: (a) current city expenditures for library services, (b) estimated levy cost per typical home, and (c) any governance changes that would affect Bellevue residents.

There was no formal action taken to endorse or oppose the levy. Instead, council directed staff to prepare accurate, neutral information and the mayor indicated staff may post comparative cost information and the ballot language on the city website for resident review prior to the election.