Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff details market-value, ADA and unit splits that would drive funding under deconsolidation
Summary
The draft plan shows estimated market-value splits and how average daily attendance and state 'unit' calculations would allocate funding between the proposed Clearwater Valley and Grangeville districts, with shared staff and apportionment numbers highlighted.
Presenter S2 walked the audience through the finance tables the plan includes and emphasized that market value and average daily attendance (ADA) are the primary drivers of state funding allocations.
The staff packet shows District 245 (proposed Clearwater Valley) would hold about 43% of the taxable market value while District 246 (proposed Grangeville) would hold about 56% under the draft boundary calculations. Presenter S2 said the district’s total ADA is approximately 1,044 and that the split of students would allocate about 28% of units to Clearwater Valley and about 71% to Grangeville in the example shown.
Staff also explained unit calculations and salary apportionment (the plan lists salary apportionment totals and examples for how certified and classified staff costs could be assigned). Shared positions—such as the superintendent, nurse and specialty services—would be allocated by the new boards after trustee appointments, and shared technology or facilities would be split based on ADA calculations presented in the packet.
