Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Adus And Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission discusses 11 Warren update and whether ADU grants and guidance can help preserve carriage houses
Summary
Members discussed 11 Warren Street remaining inactive until an application triggers review, and broadened the conversation to ADU grants, RUPCO funding, and potential preservation-led outreach or pattern books to help rehabilitate alley carriage houses while protecting historic character.
Commissioners reported that 11 Warren Street remains dormant in the absence of a triggering application and broadened discussion to how preservation tools can support housing and the upkeep of alley carriage houses.
The Chair led a policy-focused exchange about accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and grant opportunities. A committee member noted state grant programs that in some cases can provide substantial funding — "I think you can get up to, like, a $140,000," the committee member said — but observed that Hudson code currently restricts ADUs to single-family, owner-occupied properties. Another commissioner referenced a specific nonprofit grant program, RUPCO, and its assistance levels: "the grant that I was referring to before is Rumpco, and it looks like you can get up to $112,500, to add an accessory dwelling unit onto your property," he said, noting income qualifications apply.
Discussion turned to outreach and code changes: commissioners suggested preparing a pattern book or guidance pamphlet to explain the commission’s role and to show owners design approaches that preserve historic character while enabling sensitive housing additions. Members emphasized careful messaging to avoid alarming property owners about costs and restrictions and proposed collaborating with planning staff to institutionalize cross-department review.
