Get email alerts on the Demand Side topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commenters urge PSC to require IRP to expand demand-side programs, EV support and community solar
Summary
Speakers urged inclusion of robust demand-side resources in the IRP: more aggressive demand-response, battery storage, community solar, and stronger utility support for electric-vehicle deployment.
Multiple commenters argued that the IRP sidelines demand-side solutions that could reduce peak needs and avoid building expensive new generation. Karen Kirk (Montanans for Affordable Energy) said Northwestern's report ignored demand-response and battery-storage opportunities that could shave meaningful peak capacity; she cited a summer peak reduction potential of about 121 MW from demand response referenced in a study.
Jesse Terrien urged Northwestern to treat electric vehicles as mainstream rather than an "emerging technology," noting EVs can account for 30% to 50% of household electricity for some drivers and that utilities should provide clearer resources and incentives. Paul Pacini described community solar mechanics and asked that the commission require community/shared solar be considered as a resource in planning.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
