Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Unified Development Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends unified development code to city council amid concerns about review time
Summary
The commission voted to recommend the City of Socorro’s Unified Development Code to city council on Aug. 6 after a lengthy presentation and debate. Commissioners voiced concerns about document length, data‑center standards, and being "in the dark" on FTZ302 and other large‑scale uses.
City planning staff and consultants presented the final draft of a Unified Development Code (UDC) on July 21 and asked the Planning & Zoning Commission to recommend the draft to city council. Victoria Chavez, the consultant leading the presentation for Able City, summarized the three‑year process of public and stakeholder engagement and said the UDC consolidates zoning, subdivision, development standards, review procedures and enforcement into a single, coordinated code.
The draft includes new zoning districts (for example R‑2A), clarified lot coverage and height standards, and separate treatment and review procedures for data centers and large logistics facilities. Chavez said data centers will require a specific‑use approval with studies on water demand, cooling methods, fuel storage and annual compliance reporting; large logistics uses will receive additional conditional review. "We are trying to consolidate your current code... bringing this into a more concise and clear UDC structure," Chavez told commissioners.
Commissioners nonetheless expressed strong reservations about the document’s size (462 pages) and the time available for review before a scheduled city council appearance on Aug. 6. Multiple commissioners said they felt they had not had the hours needed to review each chapter in depth; one commissioner said the commission and the community had been "in the dark" about related items such as FTZ302 (a federal trade zone) and asked that the council be urged to take extra time if needed. Staff and consultants acknowledged the workload and said amendments could be made after adoption, and that some sections had been prioritized for commissioners’ review.
After extended discussion — including questions about minimum lot widths, panhandle lots, street widths, and distinctions among warehouses, distribution, and data centers — a commissioner moved and the commission voted to recommend the UDC to city council for adoption. Staff noted the city council schedule and that the recommendation would be forwarded for council’s August 6 meeting; council will review the material and can postpone or ask for amendments.
